#general
General Discussions & Topics
Thread
For our AI enthusiasts, I saw an interesting post in another channel for marketing professionals. Has this been an issue for any of you? Have you seen this trend of team shared GenAI accounts?
🚨 Ethical dilemma: Her boss just created a shared GenAI account, and now she’s expected to contribute her prompts. The problem? She’s spent years honing her language skills, and her prompts reflect deep intellectual training. Sharing them feels like giving away her thinking process—and potentially enabling someone to replicate her work without the skill behind it.
Has anyone else faced this? How do you balance team transparency with protecting your expertise?
That's frustrating. I would probably contribute something helpful but I wouldn't help them build my AI replacement.
I’m not an attorney and not saying if this is morally accurate but I think legally if you made the prompts on company time the prompts are the organization’s intellectual property.
I share my prompts and often help others on the team with customGPTs
Yea I was thinking about that.
<@U08U4PV81KP> @Mary Green (Owner CMAweekly) but it gets murky. For example, artists style or likeness being used such as movies where actors are not compensated for the use of their likeness. It’s quite the grey area!
That def seems unethical!